#211
|
|||||
|
|||||
Aside from all of that? The damage would be 1d10 + Strength Bonus10 + Power Attack. It's +1 attack for +3 damage at level 1, and an additional -1 attack for +3 damage for every +4 BAB you have.12 damage. Still not sure where the +7 in your "1d10+7+31" rolls came from. Just a note, I'm not stalling the game; I'm thinking on my next post and I'm hoping for Weasel to tell me more about those Meta-Bullet feats. I don't plan on shooting into the water, what with the pesky cover it'd provide, but Trog 1 is still faffing about on the surface and deserves a bullet. Last edited by Muggins; Feb 14th, 2014 at 08:09 AM. |
#212
|
|||||
|
|||||
Sorry about that muggins. My game info is stored on a flash drive and I'll bring it in to work and transfer it over.
Edit- I have also enjoyed the exchange in the ooc and was going to weigh in, it was so much fun reading it. The last play is under further review.
__________________
I am Weasel! Last edited by Weasel Whisperer; Feb 14th, 2014 at 10:11 AM. |
#213
|
|||||
|
|||||
Yeah, BAB doesn't apply to damage, only attack rolls. You round down for damage. So 10 from strength.
You take a -4 penalty to attack rolls for an additional +12 damage from Power Attack. (-1 at level 1, -2 at level 4, -3 at level 8, -4 at level 12) You get 3 extra damage from your weapon enchantment. 2 damage for weapon specialization. And you get an additional 7 force damage from your weapon. 10+12+3+2+7= 34 additional damage when you Power Attack. Otherwise your normal damage output with that weapon is +22. Also, rules as strictly written is that you can't Vital Strike OR Cleave on a charge, but it's ultimately up to Weasel as to whether or not to allow such an action. And to further correct. A bastard sword is only considered exotic when wielded in one hand, otherwise it is an martial weapon. So technically you'd only get the benefits from Weapon Focus and Weapon Spec (Bastard Sword) while you wield the bastard sword with two hands. Last edited by InsaneFox; Feb 14th, 2014 at 05:16 PM. |
#214
|
|||||
|
|||||
Oh ok so I should have been doing more damage then.
I think we can just change the charge to a movement action rather than having it as a charge combined with a cleave and power attack it just makes it easier. Thanks Insane for clearing all that up. |
#215
|
|||||
|
|||||
It's still technically a bit less. You had +7+31, but the +34 above is with the 7 already incorporated. But yeah, no problem. I must have missed your last post asking for a double check on your damage, or else I would have done it much sooner.
Let us know if you have any questions, I, at least, don't mind helping out. Last edited by InsaneFox; Feb 14th, 2014 at 05:42 PM. |
#216
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
If he's wielding it two-handed, it's -1 attack for +3 damage (not -1 for +2). Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Muggins; Feb 14th, 2014 at 09:28 PM. |
#217
|
|||||
|
|||||
I disagree about the weapon proficiency. Looking into it, I've found a post from James Jacobs (one of the creative directors at Paizo) that supports my theory. (6th post on the page.)
Another way to look at the bastard sword is that it's a two-handed martial weapon that can be wielded in one hand as an exotic weapon. As for the Weapon Spec., well I agree with you on that. |
#218
|
|||||
|
|||||
Except that, just two posts below that, there's this.
Quote:
|
#219
|
|||||
|
|||||
But by that logic, you can't use a bastard sword at all without Exotic Weapon Proficiency, since if there is no Martial Weapon Proficiency: Bastard Sword, than Bastard Sword isn't covered on the list of weapons that one is granted proficiency under Martial Weapon Proficiency (All).
Looking at it from another logical angle. Any character that is proficient with martial weapons is proficient in wielding a bastard sword in two hands. Weapon Focus/Specialization doesn't have a feat prerequisite, it merely requires one to be proficient in the weapon. If a character were to lose proficiency in the weapon (like, for example, trying to use a bastard sword in one hand without EWP) than they would no longer qualify for any feats that require proficiency... until they again meet the prerequisites (weilding in two hands, in this case.) |
#220
|
|||||
|
|||||
There is no Martial Weapon Proficiency (Bastard Sword), it's just considered to be one for the purposes of proficiency when wielded in two hands.
![]() There's nothing really coming from this, so I'll just step out of this discussion. Good points, and I think I might be biased towards the way that it always has been. I've never seen someone even argue otherwise, because that's just how it works. |
#221
|
|||||
|
|||||
Indeed, ultimately it's up to the Whisper of Weasels to decide, either way it's no particular skin off of my back. My character's weapon is complicated enough when it comes to the rules. Hah!
|
#222
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
Lastly, what's the point of this when I can just cast Fireball or Sleet Storm? Quote:
|
#223
|
|||||
|
|||||
Hope everyone has had a good weekend. I've spent mine with my wife and had a decent Valentines. I also modified ricochet and shatter blast.
Let's continue on with the battle and as normal. It's really just a test battle to get a sense of your characters' strength as a whole and work the kinks out of combat.
__________________
I am Weasel! |
#224
|
|||||
|
|||||
Can I swap some of my Meta-Bullet feats for something else? I don't feel like their original descriptions match what they actually do. For one thing, they didn't all consume powder.
Quote:
|
#225
|
|||||
|
|||||
I don't think Chioni's going to pursue in this case. She's comfortable with her abilities (and I'm comfortable w/ them as a player), so don't wait up for her.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|