#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
Cooperative Cogitations
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
Do you want us rolling ability scores in the roll spot?
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
I think I've got my character done. Please look it over as I've never played a summoner before and am still kinda new to Pathfinder.
One question I had is I took the feat Augment Summoning to help buff my summons. Does that feat also buff my eidolon? I'm guessing not because the eidolon isn't a summon spell proper, but I thought I'd ask.
__________________
(((•))) |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
ahaha...so tempted to take a look at that sheet :P
Alzaren I believe that we are doing point buy...if ryator had mentioned rolls later in the application thread then i missed them :P But I think it was epic (25) point buy. And regarding your question, Still Pond, I have read a few forums about it, apparently people are arguing haha. Anyways, I read that during the ritual summoning, augment summoning does not work, but as per the spell Summon Eidolon the eidolon would be buffed up. However, I leave the ruling on ritual summon and augment summoning to the GM ![]() Last edited by Cuross; Apr 26th, 2011 at 04:04 AM. |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
@Alzaren - indeed; as Cuross noted; epic point buy. If you need any help with allocation, please let me know. We can chat it up in your private thread.
@Still Pond - holy crap...that was quick. I'll have a look today, and do some leg work on your question. I've also heard different schools of thought on it, but I'll make a ruling. |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
@Still Pond - that's gotta' be the best picture I've ever seen for a gnome summoner
@All - if you can, please provide a profile picture that I can use for your map token. If not, you'll get a silly default and be ridiculed across Belkzen |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
Thanks, I thought that picture fit. As for map tokens, you can just use that character portrait if you want but to give you choices I'll post a few sprites, one of the gnome and one of his
![]() ![]() ![]() Oh, and about private threads vs public, I don't care. I try not to meta-game in general and I probably won't read threads that don't pertain to my character anyway.
__________________
(((•))) Last edited by Still_Pond; Apr 26th, 2011 at 10:29 AM. |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
Ryator, we are only allowed to use books from Pathfinder correct?
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
Yes; Pathfinder only, sorry.
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
I just had a thought, would it be beneficial if each team had an OOC thread for their own use, however private?
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
Based on the fact that I'm now going to segregate the two teams, yes, we will be breaking the OOC into two threads.
We're looking at starting by next Monday at the latest everyone. We've got quite a few sheets in already; but there are some who haven't yet answered their invites. I'll catch up with them and get all in order to start. Until then, I'll be moving things around in these threads - making private, creating folders, etc...so, don't mind me. I'm just trying to make it more manageable from my end, since I can see every darn thread. |
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
@Still_Pond - can you make sure you can see the Despicable game thread? I think that I kept missing an underscore in your name, and it wouldn't take.
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
My sheet will be done tomorrow, if not tonight.
__________________
Rise of the Runelords - GM | Black Match - Casey Lyons
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
No worries; no hurry. If we get everyone done early, I'll start early, but we're aiming for next Monday at the very latest.
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
No, I can't see it. That underscore should work, or if not, PM an admin and they can fix it I'm sure.
__________________
(((•))) |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|